The New Rules of Engagement, Part II: Tennis Anyone? August 12, 2010
Posted by Amit J. Shanker, MD, FHRS, FACC in Health Policy.Tags: Healthcare reform, Practice management, Quality & outcomes, Reimbursement
2 comments
Back when I played competitive tennis, I learned that there were two distinct strategies between playing on grass and clay. On grass (a quick surface with lower ball bounces), a player needs to think at least one or two shots ahead– even though, despite the best efforts, most shots will be reflexive. To be successful on clay (a slower surface with higher, more unpredictable ball bounces), a player needs to think three to four shots ahead to win the point. We will need to use the clay court strategy with healthcare reform: Patient, but deliberately placed aggressive initiatives that ultimately build the foundation for self-sustaining policies. (more…)
Health Care Policy: Let’s Work Together to Make a Difference! July 29, 2010
Posted by Andrea M. Russo, MD, FACC, FHRS in Health Policy.Tags: Healthcare reform, Reimbursement
add a comment
Recent changes in U.S. health care policy and reimbursement will greatly affect how we deliver care to patients with arrhythmia disorders. The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) maintains a strong voice in Washington, D.C., with advocacy efforts focusing on issues of critical importance to heart rhythm specialists. Our goal is to help promote a stronger health care system that provides patients with the care they need, when they need it. We recognize that the needs of health care specialists may differ from those of general practitioners when it comes to caring for patients with complex heart rhythm disorders, and that the care of these patients requires a “team approach.” (more…)
The New Rules of Engagement Part I: A Call to Action July 14, 2010
Posted by Amit J. Shanker, MD, FHRS, FACC in Health Policy.Tags: Healthcare reform, Medicare
6 comments
When Medicare was enacted in 1965, it promised not to interfere in the practice of medicine:
“Nothing in this title shall be construed to authorize any federal officer or employee to exercise any supervision or control over the practice of medicine, or the manner in which medical services are provided, or over the selection, tenure, or compensation of any officer, or employee, or any institution, agency or person providing health care services….” Section 1801, Medicare Act, 1965
Unfortunately, times have changed… (more…)
Shoot, Ready, Aim! June 18, 2010
Posted by Amit J. Shanker, MD, FHRS, FACC in Health Policy.Tags: Healthcare reform
add a comment
During the Heart Rhythm 2010 Opening Plenary Session, Dr. Richard Fogel, FHRS, CCDS, Chair of HRS’ Health Policy Committee, vigorously argued for the need to heed physician input regarding healthcare legislation. Senator Tom Daschle appeared to dismiss his plea by responding, “Do you really want things to remain the way they are right now?” Unfortunately, Senator Daschle’s response is emblematic of how H.R. 3590 came to pass. (more…)
Independent Payment Advisory Board: Not time to panic…yet. May 20, 2010
Posted by Amit J. Shanker, MD, FHRS, FACC in Health Policy.Tags: Healthcare reform, Medicare, Practice management, Reimbursement
2 comments
The recent passage of HR 3590 has commissioned the establishment of the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) in 2014. This independent and unelected presidential commission of appointed officials will have unchecked power to unilaterally cut reimbursements paid to medical-service providers —though, hospitals are ostensibly exempted. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that IPAB mandates would result in a total savings of $13 billion over 10 years. The director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, Peter Orszag, told the Financial Times, “The commission would have the power to propose changes to hit the growth targets for healthcare spending, which would take effect unless Congress enacts alternative proposals with equivalent savings. I don’t think people have appreciated just how big a game changer this could be.” So let’s explore some of the concerns and misconceptions surrounding the establishment of the IPAB: (more…)
Sunshine Act and COIs: Too Much Transparency? May 15, 2010
Posted by Ariana Del Negro, Heart Rhythm 2010 Quality in Scientific Sessions.Tags: Conflict of Interest, Financial disclosures, Healthcare reform
add a comment
In the interest of moving towards greater transparency across the health care system, the new health care reform legislation includes the Physician Payment Sunshine Act, which will make it mandatory, by 2013, for all drug and medical device manufacturers to publicly report gifts and payments of value greater than $10 made to physicians and teaching hospitals in any one year. Disclosures to the federal government will include physician name, address, national provider identifier (NPI, related to Medicare and other payment programs), the value and form of the payment, as well as the specific drug or device the payment was related to. Beginning September 30, 2013 and each year thereafter, the information will be entered into a searchable database made available online. Of potential concern is the fact that this information (with the exception of the NPI) will be made available to the general public. And the general public is not only your patients, friends, neighbors, etc., but also the institutions that you work for, and, of course, lawyers. In essence and aptly put by Eric G. Campbell, PhD (Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital) during the Health Policy Town Hall Session at this year’s Heart Rhythm 2010, the release of this information means that “everyone is going to know your business.”
Performance Measures: Defining Our Terms May 3, 2010
Posted by Andrea M. Russo, MD, FACC, FHRS in Health Policy.Tags: Healthcare reform, Quality & outcomes, Reimbursement
add a comment
Public and private payers are moving away from fee-for-service models and toward value-based purchasing models to reimburse physicians, hospitals, and other health care professionals. With the goal to create incentives to deliver higher quality care and lower overall costs, providers are increasingly being held accountable to quality standards and performance measures. (more…)
Expanding NP Services: Effect on Heart Rhythm Care April 23, 2010
Posted by Heather M. Ross, DNP, ANP-BC, CCDS, CEPS, FHRS in Allied Health Professionals.Tags: Healthcare reform, Practice management
2 comments
Are you a nurse practitioner? Do you work with one? In a recent post about transitions in health care policies, Dr. Amit Shanker mentioned the issue of scope of practice. Have you ever wondered why nurse practitioners and physician assistants function so differently at different institutions? It’s partly due to practice and institutional policies, but even more closely related to state legislatures. That’s right: scope of practice is determined by your elected state legislators.
Twenty-eight states are currently considering expanding nurse practitioners’ scope of practice to alleviate the national shortage of primary care physicians and provide care for the estimated 32 million Americans who will gain health insurance in the next few years. These state-level policy changes would reflect health reform legislation including nurse practitioners as medical home providers. (more…)
The New Era of Hospital-Employed Subspecialty Practices April 19, 2010
Posted by Amit J. Shanker, MD, FHRS, FACC in Health Policy.Tags: CMS, Fee schedules, Healthcare reform, Scientific Sessions
1 comment so far
Independent subspecialty practices face daunting challenges in the near term. The transition in subspecialty medicine from independent group-based practice to hospital-employed practice appears imminent. Much of this transition will be the result of established and developing policies that “nudge” entities in this direction.
Soft Paternalism, or Libertarian Paternalism, is an approach to behavioral economics wherein policies are designed to maintain freedom of choice while also steering people’s decisions in directions that “will make their lives better.” The premise behind these policies presupposes that people are susceptible to a wide array of routine biases resulting in poor decisions. In this regard, public policy can “nudge” people into making more prudent decisions. One of the co-authors of this concept, Cass R. Sunstein, was appointed by the Obama administration in January 2009 to head the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.
Policies that direct physicians toward hospital employment have been in existence for quite a while; however, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has felt more emboldened in the past year with the support of the current administration. A few of these policies have included: pending resolution of the sustainable growth rate model, increased scrutiny and new regulations around physician ownership of facilities where they refer patients, the scope of practice issues at the state level, divergent goals between specialist and primary care physician societies, and substantial cuts in reimbursement for cardiology services in the 2010 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (much of which was predicated on flawed PPIS data). (more…)
What are Your Thoughts on Health Care Reform? April 14, 2010
Posted by Michael Giudici, MD, FACC, FACP, FHRS in Health Policy.Tags: Healthcare reform, Quality & outcomes
add a comment
As you probably know, this year’s Scientific Sessions Opening Plenary Session will focus on the recently passed health care reform law, the shift toward an outcomes-based payment system and the impact of both on the practice of medicine. For example, Congress did not include a permanent solution to the Medicare physician payment formula in the new law.
I encourage you to complete the Heart Rhythm Society’s short survey to help identify the health care topics and issues that are most important to you and assist us in framing the issues for the Opening Plenary Session panelists. They want to understand the impact of changes such as the new quality-based payment structures, the bundling of services, the impact of changes on the advancement of new electrophysiology technologies, etc., on your practice. Please take a few minutes to complete the survey available at http://hrs.informz.net/survistapro/s.asp?id=3861. (more…)